In the corporate world, there’s a phrase, whispered in frustration in agencies and freelance chats worldwide: “Can you just make the logo bigger?” It’s a cliché, but it’s a perfect synecdoche for a much larger problem—the systemic lack of respect for the profession of graphic design.
Design is everywhere. It dictates how you navigate a website, which brand of coffee you choose from a crowded shelf, and whether you find a public transport map helpful or infuriating. Its influence on commerce, culture, and daily life is immeasurable. Yet, the professionals who craft these experiences are often relegated to the role of “pixel pushers,” seen not as strategic partners but as technicians who simply “make things pretty.” This is the central paradox of design: its ubiquity has made it simultaneously essential and invisible, leading to a profound misunderstanding of its value.
So, why does a field that requires a deep understanding of psychology, strategy, and technical craft struggle for the same professional respect afforded to architects, engineers, or even marketers? The reasons are complex, rooted in perception, technology, and economics.
1. The Illusion of Simplicity: The Tool vs. The Craft
The single greatest contributor to the devaluation of design is the democratization of its tools. With the rise of user-friendly platforms like Canva and the accessibility of powerful software like the Adobe Creative Suite, the barrier to creating a design has been lowered to almost nothing. This creates a dangerous illusion: if anyone can use the tool, then anyone can do the job.
This is akin to believing that owning a set of surgical scalpels makes you a surgeon. The reality is that the tool is merely an instrument. The true work of a designer happens long before a cursor moves. It involves:
- Research: Understanding the target audience, market position, and competitive landscape.
- Strategy: Defining the problem that design needs to solve. Is it to increase sales, improve user comprehension, or build brand loyalty?
- Theory: Applying foundational principles of typography, color theory, composition, hierarchy, and accessibility that guide the user’s eye and mind.
- Iteration: Sketching, wireframing, and prototyping countless ideas to find the most effective solution, not just the most aesthetically pleasing one.
A non-designer might choose a color because they “like it.” A professional designer chooses a color because it evokes a specific emotion aligned with the brand’s strategy, has appropriate contrast for readability (WCAG standards), and works within a larger, cohesive system. The final result may look simple, but its simplicity is born of intense complexity.
2. The Invisibility of Good Design
Paradoxically, the better the design, the less we notice it. When a website’s user interface is intuitive, when signage guides you effortlessly through an airport, or when a book’s layout makes for a seamless reading experience, the design has succeeded by becoming invisible. It just works.
We only tend to notice design when it fails—a confusing form, an unreadable menu, a frustrating app. Because we only consciously register the bad, we subconsciously devalue the good. We don’t praise the architect when a building stands firm; we only curse them when it leaks. This invisibility makes it difficult for clients and the public to appreciate the immense thought and deliberate decision-making that prevent such failures.
3. The Subjectivity Trap
“I’m not sure… I just don’t like it.”
This is perhaps the most infuriating feedback a designer can receive. Design is one of the few professional fields where objective, goal-oriented work is routinely dismissed with subjective, personal taste. Few would tell an engineer that a bridge’s support structure “doesn’t feel right,” or tell a lawyer that a contract’s wording “isn’t vibing” with them.
Yet, because visual communication is perceived as art, it’s subjected to the whims of personal preference. A professional designer’s job is not to cater to the client’s personal taste, but to create a solution that achieves a specific goal for a target audience. Effective feedback is tied to the project’s objectives: “Does this layout make the call-to-action clear enough?” or “Will this color palette resonate with our target demographic of young professionals?” Treating design as mere decoration, rather than strategic communication, fundamentally undermines the designer’s expertise.
4. The Economic “Race to the Bottom”
The perception of design as a commodity rather than a service has been accelerated by the gig economy. Spec work contests and freelance platforms that encourage bidding wars frame design as a product with a fixed, and often shockingly low, price. The infamous “I have a nephew who can do it for $50” is no longer just a joke; it’s a business model for some.
This devalues the entire profession, forcing designers to justify their rates against an artificially low anchor. It ignores the fact that a $5,000 branding package isn’t for a “logo”; it’s for the research, strategy, and expert execution that results in a timeless brand identity—an asset that can generate millions in revenue over its lifetime. Design is an investment, not an expense.
The Path Forward: From Order Taker to Strategic Partner
Reclaiming respect for the design profession requires a conscious effort from both designers and those who hire them.
For Designers: The onus is on us to become better communicators. We must learn to articulate the “why” behind our decisions in the language of business—ROI, conversion, brand equity, and user engagement. We must guide our clients through the strategic process, transforming them from passive approvers into informed collaborators. Using contracts, defining scope, and confidently charging for our value are not just business practices; they are acts of professional self-respect.
For Clients and Businesses: The shift is one of mindset. Involve designers at the beginning of a project, not at the end to “add a coat of paint.” Trust their expertise. You hired a professional for their knowledge, not just their hands. Provide feedback that is strategic, not just subjective. Understand that investing in good design is one of the most effective ways to build a strong brand, connect with customers, and achieve your business goals.
Ultimately, true respect for design isn’t just about being nicer to designers. It’s about recognizing visual communication as the powerful, complex, and essential discipline it is. It’s about understanding that in a world saturated with information, clarity is power. The designer is the one who forges that clarity. Respect for the profession is respect for the process, the strategy, and the profound impact of a well-placed pixel.
Sources and Further Reading
- Don Norman, The Design of Everyday Things.
A foundational text on user-centered design. Norman brilliantly explains why well-designed objects feel intuitive and poorly-designed ones are frustrating, making a powerful case for the “invisible” work of the designer in preventing failure.
Link: https://www.nngroup.com/books/design-of-everyday-things-revised/
2. Mike Monteiro, Design Is a Job.
A direct and essential read for every designer. Monteiro argues for professionalism, accountability, and the designer’s role as a strategic partner, directly confronting issues like subjective feedback and the need to charge for value.
Link: https://abookapart.com/products/design-is-a-job
3. AIGA, “AIGA Position on Spec Work”.
The professional association for design provides a clear and concise explanation of what “speculative work” is and why it is detrimental to the profession and to clients. This is a key resource for understanding the economic devaluation discussed in the article.
Link: https://www.aiga.org/resources/aiga-position-on-spec-work
4. Nielsen Norman Group, “The ROI of User Experience”.
This article is one of many from the NN/g that provides a framework for communicating the business value of design. It helps designers and clients move the conversation from cost to investment, linking good design directly to key business metrics.
Link: https://www.nngroup.com/articles/roi-of-ux/
5. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), “Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) Overview”.
The official source for the technical standards mentioned in the article. This shows that design decisions, especially in digital spaces, are often governed by complex, objective standards, not just aesthetic preference.
Leave a comment